Illegals are Above the Law?

Illegals are Above the Law? investigates how illegal aliens have broken the law, and should suffer for the consequences of their lawbreaking.

Democrats Settle on Excuse for L.A. Riots: It’s Trump’s Fault for Enforcing the Law

Democrats have settled on an excuse for the ongoing riots in Los Angeles: they are Trump’s fault for arresting illegal aliens; for federalizing the California National Guard; in short, for attempting to enforce existing laws.

So Democrats have short or convenient memories, don’t they! Wasn’t it just a short time back that they insisted that “Nobody is above the law!”? I mean, they wanted to put Trump in jail because he mis checked a wrong box on is tax return, which was disputed, and not necessary wrong, and it wasn’t even against the law. But they wanted him in jail. It is a wonder they didn’t even want that “crime” punished with capital punishment!

But Trump went through a horrible time of attacks, and the defense that Democrats gave was that they cannot give anybody a pass from submitting to the law of the land.

Illegal Immigration is Against the Laws Congress has Established

The truth of the matter is that Democrats want to make “only severe criminals” among the illegal immigrants as in any way valid to deport. That is because these people usually stay in their own culture in the US, and they do their crimes against other illegal aliens.

But isn’t entering the country illegally against the law? Why aren’t they supporting Trump’s deportations if they want the laws of the land to be enforced? They don’t want that. They want to use the laws of the land when they can use them to attack their opponents, and when it “is not convenient” they totally ignore those laws. This is exactly the kinds of practices in foreign countries that are causing these people to enter the US. But the Democrats are making the USA just like these banana republics these people come from. Actually, with these immigrants from these countries, they are importing these practices.

But the point is, are Democrats going to uphold the laws of Congress? These laws were passed by a majority of Congress in every case. Minorities cannot pass laws. In the United States, everybody has to accept what the majority will is. That point is pressed home when Obama and Biden were elected. “Elections have consequences” as Obama said, defending that what he was doing was bad. He in essence said, “maybe it is bad, but elections have consequences, so suck it up and accept it.”

Another very important point is illegal immigration is not “made right” by illegally living and working in the United States. We have laws, and being physically present in the country does not grant you citizenship nor the right to remain in the country, even though they “laid down roots.” There are illegals that are being deported that have businesses in the United States now, their children were born in the United States and with the parents being deported, they will be separated from their children. That is, unless, like a good parent, they take their American citizen children with them. But that is not ever considered as an option. The other option is the US government takes custody of the children from them, and places them in foster homes. But the illegal parent’s point is that they want to use those children to stay in the United States.

The right of custody of your own child is lost when you break the law. No criminal can use the fact that he or she has a small child, and going to jail would be a hardship on their child, so leave the criminal free. That is not how the law works. So we have to question if Democrats even understand the laws that they say “nobody is above the law”, and how those laws work.

The “Maryland man” case of Abriego is another example. The Democrats moved for federal judges to order Trump to return him to the US, that his deportation is invalid. But the law says that when a non US citizen comes into the country, goes through the immigration courts procedures, and is judged to be deported, he has to be deported. Now the US government has sufficient evident of serious crimes, trafficking in minors, whether that be for slave work or sexual work, Abriego should be back in the US in a federal prison for 20 years and then deported. So Trump’s DOJ has brought him back. But the point of bringing him back is to free him into the US, according to Democrats. Their plan backfired when they brought more and more serious charges against him.

The law is very specific and has been for many years now, both Republican and Democrat lawmakers coming to an understanding, immigration and citizenship is a privilege not a right. When a foreigner applies for visiting, working, or naturalization, immigration (according to the laws of the United States) has to fill out an application and declare under oath that those declarations are the truth.

Drug addicts, prostitutes, gays, and criminals don’t Qualify for Citizenship

Unwanted people are not considered for any kind of Visa. These reasons are for example, terrorists, drug dealers or users (Prince Harry wrote a book bragging about his drug use, when he got a Visa saying he declared under oath that he hadn’t used drugs), prostitutes, homosexuals, or anybody that has broken the law of where they were coming from. Immigration does not want to even consider immigrants coming from places that don’t have public records that can be checked for infractions, listing the people’s names.

So people who are robbers in some other country, are most probably going to do the same in the United States, and immigration is the organization designated by the law to both accept foreigners into our country, AND TO EXCLUDE UNDESIRABLES from entering our country. The Democrat party has crippled immigration law. The whole idea of a sanctuary city is exactly this point, to open the border for anybody, even people excluded by our immigration law to enter our country.

Who is above the law now? The Democrats

It is very important to understand that not everybody is happy with every law that exists in our land. Most people in our country do not like paying taxes. But to live in our society, you have to submit to even the laws that you don’t like. Many don’t like the speed limits. But if they disobey them, a policeman pulls them over, they have to pay the price.

The illegal population is paying the price for breaking the law in Los Angeles today. Why are we crying for them? Why would we consider making them “above the law” for whatever reason? This is craziness. But this is one of the planks that the Democrat party is and has been running on. I am not accusing the Democrats of something they do not openly declare, even brag about.

Illegals are Above the Law?