Do Democrats Have a Smarter Strategy on National Security?

Do Democrats Have a Smarter Strategy on National Security? Examines how Democrats are less smarter i.e. dumb when it comes to these matters.

Definition of smarter – Having or showing intelligence; bright. synonym: intelligent. Canny and shrewd in dealings with others. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition

Kha​nna: ‘Democrats Have a Much Smarter Strategy on National Security’
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/09/03/khanna-democrats-have-a-much-smarter-strategy-on-national-security/

Using Reason, Logic, and Wisdom to Discern

We cannot allow people to just insist on a point and concede to them that they are right because they are loud, yell, shout, or repeat their errors incessantly. Pure declaration over and over does not make a person right. What is right has to be judged by means of criteria. For something to be “smarter”, it has to fulfill the propositions and objectives behind doing that thing. What are these in the matter of National Security? The security of our country, both militarily and economically.

So what are the criteria we are applying in the matter of National Security? Very simply, the good of our country, of our economy, and of our citizens (which their citizenship have been established over time, like generations).

“OUR” national security is not based on doing good things for China, Russia, or the rest of the world. While opening the border to free immigration and citizenship to the world may be good for the world, it is horrible for the United States. Opening all of our secrets of national defense and giving them and our technology to China or Russia is suicide for us.

So in this article Democrat Khanna argues that the Republican ideas about national security are wrong, incorrect, outdated, etc. Every vile accusation that they can think of, Khanna and the rest of the Democrat party throws at Donald Trump and the Republicans. So let’s just review a few things over the past few years.

Nancy Pelosi and her Chinese Spy Chauffer

So Nancy Pelosi’s chauffer for years was revealed by the CIA/FBI to be a Chinese spy. Every conversation he overheard while in Pelosi’s presence, in her house, etc. he could have and probably did repeat for his Chinese handlers. That shows a “smarter” National Security strategy? Who is so foolish to think that these people know anything about National Security?

Salwell and his Chinese Honey Pot

So it is well known that Eric Salwell (a potential 2028 Democrat presidential candidate) has a wife, and a Chinese lover. The Chinese lover, Fang Fang, is a Chinese operative. This is ridiculous. Salwell is on the National Security Council in Congress. How can this be smarter? It is smarter only if you want the destruction of our nation! So again and again what we see as common occurrences, the Democrats are totally ignorant and unworried about National Security risks. They are causing these risks and liabilities. Why would the nation allow any Democrat to get involved in any way with national security?

Barack Obama and Iran

Iran declared war on the United States some 40 years ago. While there were not actual battlefields with American and Iranian soldiers fighting one another over these years, they did attack our military bases in the Middle East. Then there was 911. They attacked on US soil.

Barack Obama did deals with Iran where he arranged for billions of dollars of cash to be given to them (on pallets no less) and that they would be allowed to develop nuclear capabilities. That is a smarter national security? These people cleared declared at the beginning of all of this that the US was the great Satan, and they wanted to destroy both Israel and the Unied States and kill all of their people. Whether that was just them being a blow hard, mouthing off, or not, when violence repeatedly comes from them towards Israel and the United States, we as a nation must treat that as if it were a real war. Both Republican and Democrat presidents came and went and none of them really deal with them as if it were a war.

Enter Donald Trump, and he did exactly what the Iranians said they were doing, waging war against the United States, so he waged open war against Iran. He detroyed their military capabilities and took out what progress they had made towards creation of atomic bombs to drop on Israel and the United States.

Very importantly, in this war, they are frustrated extremely. Apparently, they thought that once open war broke out between Muslim Iran and Israel, with the United States in tow, that all the world, or at least all the Muslim world, would come in to support them. When that didn’t happen, they turned their weapons on their Arab neighbors and hurt them. If they would have achieved an nuclear missle before this broke, there may have been nuclear missles launched against their neighbors even though they are Muslims. These people are crazy, and Donald Trump’s wisdom and judgment is vindicated because of how the Irans are showing themselves to be. Moreover, the fact that the Iranians cannot keep their word when they sign a peace treaty or cease fire, that again shows the world that whatever they say about non-aggressive nuclear capabilities could just as easily be lies.

If another Joe Biden Democrat were in the White House during these days, he would probably be duped into believing the Iranians at every turn, at every lie. Anybody who has a logical mind cannot allow another Democrat to get into power in the US Presidency, nor in either the Senate or House. They have very poor understanding and no wisdom when it comes to National Security.

We have to use hindsight with Barak Obama, but he is a Muslim or promulsim person. His presidency proves that. No pro-muslim can be pro-America at the same time. You are either one or the other.

Joe Biden and the China Link

Joe Biden had his son Hunter work business schemes that worked to provide illicit income to the Biden family. I want to know exactly what happened to the 1.5 billion dollar loan that China gave Hunter/the Biden family. That in itself consists treason and graft. You cannot get income as a politician from foreign countries (friendly or not). Of course Biden was friendly towards China and China was friendly towards Joe Biden. They want the destruction of the United States, and Biden helped them facilitate it.

As a National Security matter, the entire Joe Biden presidency was one problem after another. If you consider the electric car fiasco that the United States entered into and is still plaging us, it was pushed on us by the Democrats and Joe Biden. The fact fact that California already was ahead of the game in electric cars, and they didn’t and still don’t have the support electrical grid to warrant adding tens of thousands of electric vehicles didn’t make anybody worry under Biden. As a National Security matter, these are mostly Chinese cars.

So when little by little it was discovered that all of these cars connect to the Internet, they are report back to China constantly without the user or the US government knowing what is being returned, and these electric cars are being purchased by military personnel that use them when on US bases, all of that becomes a great big national security risk. Where were the Democrats in that matter? They were causing the risk, not trying to prevent it. Why would you give incompetent people more power and control when they are constantly showing you that they are incompetent.

Enter DEI

So under the Democrat party policies, DEI has to be insisted upon. It is the policy of the United States (at least under Biden). When and where was that discussed, debated, and voted on in the Congress? The Democrat President declared it by fiat. That “by fiat” is like a dictator or king for those who do not understand. So immediately when Republicans and the United States general population begin understanding this, we saw immediately a new meme, “No Kings.” Who was acting like a king or dictator? Joe Biden and the Democrats have a long history of acting this way.

If Donald Trump was acting like a king, then why did he respond and suffer under those legal cases setup against him? Even in those cases, the law and legal prescendent were manipulated and ignored, and even totally overthrown, just like a dictator would do, in order to find something to frustrate and stop Trump. They were very kingly in pursuing Trump. But Trump did not do anything outside of his legal rights. If you examine everything that the Democrats use to attack Trump, they all are things that as president or as a US citizen, he has his rights. They (the Democrats) are acting like dictators, and Trump is suffering.

Do Democrats Have a Smarter Strategy on National Security?