The Problem with Communists

The Problem with Communists examines how Communism works. Resistance against government is insurrection. Governments have God-given duties and obligations which they must do.

Petro’s Recent Statements

https://www.breitbart.com/latin-america/2026/01/28/colombias-gustavo-petro-goes-off-the-rails-jesus-made-love-i-am-unforgettable-in-bed/

President Petro of Colombia recently made some comments during the opening of a new hospital. The crux is that he went crazy. He was speaking of the new beds that the hospital will supply, then said that he personally is good in bed, “a beast”, and then opened up on Jesus Christ saying that Jesus had sex with Mary Magdalena and other women. A man such as Jesus could not exist without love, so that stupid logic got him to the conclusion that Jesus had sex with women. Besides being blasphemy, because Jesus typified what is God’s norm, and Jesus was not married, he was single, so he had no sexual relationships in his earthly life. But besides that great offense of God, he made other statements.

• Note: Why Petro does not understand what he is saying.

2 Corinthians 5:21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

1 Peter 2:22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:

Hebrews 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.

The sin of sex with somebody who is not your legal spouse can be classified as the sin of adultery (one of the two are married to somebody else) or fornication (for example two single people).

Exodus 20:14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.

Romans 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

So Jesus Christ did not commit the sins of adultery nor fornication, because he was God’s perfect sacrifice for sin, himself without any personal sins, and being innocent and free from these sins, he took on the sins of mankind. That is the entire point of salvation in the Bible. So Petro is just stupid and ignorant of the Bible. He should refrain from even commenting about what he knows nothing rightly.

Petro said that Jesus was the Christ (“Cristos” in Greek) which is a title. (It is exactly.) But Petro stated that he personally does not accept Jesus as King but as a revolutionary. There is the point that I see as why no Christianity oriented person can dialog with a Communist. We should not have anything to do with any Communist. All ties economic and otherwise should be broken between the United States and Communist nations.

But why do I say that?

A Communist Champions Revolution and Insurrection

As a counterpoint, the Bible, God, and Jesus champion obedience to authority. The two cannot be further apart.

Romans 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
Romans 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
Romans 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
Romans 13:4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
Romans 13:5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.
Romans 13:6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
Romans 13:7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

See Understanding the Contradiction in “No Kings”

So to be clear, a Christian is prohibited from God as a general commandment and spiritual principle that they should not disobey a legitimately established government. The governments of the world are actually established by God, and God judges these people in government. The principle of a government worker, a politician, is that he is a minister of God to care for the people he represents. When he fails to do that, or when he is corrupt in his duties, making personal gain a primary factor in his “minister”, then God will judge that individual, and the government should be robust enough to remove him and judge him. (For God judging corrupt politicians, see God Rebukes Politicians Psalms 82) The principle applies government workers and politicians. The government should be a fear to those who break the law.

But the more we unravel this point, the more things of our begin to take a moral tone (good or bad). In other words, that same government should have some kind of justice over their own wrong doing, and individuals that abuse the system. But the principle remains that governments are ordained by God.

Insurrection is a Sin against God

Matthew 7:12 Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.

What I observe with Communism is that they have totally failed in understanding the Golden Rule. The Golden Rule lays down a principle of justice that God uses. What you want to happen to you, do that same thing in your treatment of others.

All Communists love and “swear by” (use as the guide of their lives and governments) the principle of revolution, insurrection. They glorified the revolutionaries because they stood up to government (that they didn’t like for some reason) and overthrew it. Even if they were martyred in that effort, that makes them greater heroes to the Communist. But wait a minute, when the government goes Communist, and injustices continue under the guise of the insurrection party, the Communist party, is insurrection allowed? Absolutely not! They crush all rebellion with the violence, cruel evil, inhuman injustices.

I live in Mexico (since 1986), and the current government is Morena which has basically turned Mexico into a Socialist-Communist state. For the last dozen or so years, we have had the Human Rights Commission, which has been hijacked by the cartels and criminal groups to defend themselves against any kind of government justice. President Claudia Sheimbaun rejects any war against drugs, cartels, mafia, criminal organizations because “the have their human rights.” But wait a minute. Does the passage in Romans address criminals? Yes it does.

Romans 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:

The principles and justice of God is that when a person commits a crime, and this is understood first of all in the eyes of God, and also in the eyes of the legal and justice system of their own country, then they “lose their rights”. They are incarcerated, they can lose their property and access and use of their property (Chapo Guzman is worthy billions. He was laundering a billion dollars in drug money EACH MONTH. He has no access to that ill-gotten wealth), and the maximum penalty is the death sentence. Yes, God approves 100% of the death penalty in some cases, and moreover, God orders it of governments. Any government that unilaterally refuses to apply the death penalty is itself in violation of God’s laws and principles. The very act of doing away with the death penalty minimizes the crimes committed. That goes against the rights of the victims, so human rights are violated. But the Communist makes a mockery of human rights. Only the criminals have human rights that everybody must respect.

Minnesota Riots against ICE and Immigration Law

There is a point that many seem to miss in all of what is going on in our day. That point is that our constituted government made in a bipartisan manner our immigration laws. The Democrats have in recent years rejected the immigration laws that they helped make. Officially, we call that hypocrisy. Moreover, if any law that is made is unjust, unfair, or not wise for the country, there is the same apparatus that made the laws to change the laws. To not use that legal and proper route to changing things is insurrection and resisting the established laws of the land.

For the people who resist what is the law, then these people are insurrectionists, and that is being pushed and glorified by the Democrat party. Why? Why don’t they just propose a law to change the immigration laws or just do away with all immigration laws? The obvious reason is because they are not in power. They promise that when they get in power again, all those Republicans and MAGA people will be jailed. This is what they tried to do with Donald Trump during and after his first presidency. But they failed. Why? Because in a fair, just, and by the established principles of our laws trial, he did nothing wrong. They do not accept their failure. They failed because Trump did not break the laws of the land. They hate that. (1) They are powerless to change the laws to what they want (even though Biden and Obama did so illegally through executive orders) and (2) they cannot legally convict their opponents. Note that in all of this, what is justice, a quick and fair trial, was denied to those peaceful protesters of January 6.

There is a very important point here they we need to get. What is “the law” is twisted and turned, applied excessively beyond justice in some cases, and ignored totally in other cases. On January 6, the only ones coming to that march with guns were the police watching it. Maybe the FBI agents that were secretly inserted to cause chaos had guns but nobody is acknowledging that are they? Another question that is unanswered is what were those FBI agents doing in that march? Were they on the sidelines just silently observing, or were they provoking people? Then they committed a crime and should be tried and judged. But again we see the pattern that evil uses the laws for their own purposes (to oppose their opponents) but are slippery whenever those same laws come to bear against themselves.

I am not happy when anyone loses their life, especially in the foolishness of protesting. But people need to learn,

Romans 13:4… But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Go to a government operation, be that soldiers, be that lcoal police, be that immigration control, or even in times of disaster, and you bring a weapon (prohibited and unwise in protests), and you disobey a government law enforcement agent, you will likely taste some of that “he beareth not the sword in vain” and “a revenger to execute wrath upon him doeth evil”. The evil here is to not fulfill the laws of the land.

Absolutely no ICE immigration officer has the right to change the laws of the land. It is not given to them except to vote in elections. So they are just doing their job. There is no legal purpose or obligation of any protester to be present in an ICE operation. Moreover, it is absolutely wrong, a crime, to interfere with said operation. If something is wrong, go report it to law enforcement, judges, etc. But again we come up against the problem here, any judge or law enforcement are ministers of the government, and they do not decide what the law is, only fulfil the laws that exist and execute justice when that law is broken. So their hands are tied. This frustrates the evil worker, so they cause chaos, which is against God’s will. God institutes governments (however good or bad they may actually be) to keep order and squash chaos and violence. Who is causing the violence here? The protesters.

• Nolte: Gavin Newsom & Jasmine Crockett Incited Violence Against Ice
• Mamdani Vows to ‘Fight back’ Against ICE Agents if Elected

“Nobody is above the Law”

What a contradiction between what they say and they do! The saying is a truism. That is it is true under the authority of God, but notice how these people (Democrats and Communists, which are daily being merged into the same thing), these people use the law for unlawful purposes. They want to use the law illicitly so that they can conquer their opponents.

But let’s analyze this for a minute. If truly as the Democrats cry, “Nobody is above the law”, then the says that a foreign born person cannot be in the physical United States without permission to do so by the US Immigration Office. Those permissions are varied, but they all have conditions on their being granted. For example, if a legal immigrant to the US abuses his spouse, (for example, the Maryland man), then he loses his permission and has to be deported. If the legal immigrant is apprehended using or selling drugs, stealing, raping, murdering somebody, etc. then they have a proceeding and according to the law, they have to be deported if not incarcerated for some time in the US first, but upon serving their time, they have to be deported as per their immigrant permission conditions.

Okay, if they break the law, they go through a legal proceeding for their crime, and if found guilty they serve time, and then are released. But the law states that if that person is an illegal alien, or even if they are a legal immigrant, that jail has to release that individual to ICE and then be deported for the law to be obeyed. There is no doubt in this point at all. They have lost any right or permission to be in the United States. Because they illegally vote Democrat, that does not give them immunity from the immigration laws.

The immigration department of the United States is enforcing the immigration laws that are given to them by Congress. Who is above the law? Can ICE do whatever they want to do? No. They are under the same laws as every one person living in the United States. Who is above the law? The legal or illegal immigrant? NO. That is the point. So the laws of the land are all hypocrisy and empty vanity unless there is some physical process and people to enforce the laws. That is the local police and ICE. So to physical resist and frustrate the work of law enforcement and ICE means that person is committing a crime in themselves, and should also be taken and judged. If they resist arrest, or worse, if they use force to resist or escape arrest by using their car or pulling a weapon, then note, “deadly force used by law enforcement is justified.” That is our law. If you talk to law enforcement veterans, there can be no other option. That is why Democrat controlled states and cities are hamstring law enforcement and they are leaving those places to work in places where the government supports them doing their job.

Thus the great exodus from heavenly California to Republican controlled and run places. California is becoming hellish, and sane people are choosing to live elsewhere. Why? Because of the incorrect use of laws. When will somebody finally cause grief to Gavin Newsome because of his lack of proper forest management in California forests? That is the real reason those forest fires do such damage. That and the point that people want to build and live on land that is dangerous because of landslides from rains, and wild fires. But California permits that because Malibou is a rich property tax income area for California. So when government and the law does not protect and bless the people that government is set up to protect and serve, then they become criminal. The graft and corruption comes hand-in-hand with bad government.

What to do with Communist Governments?

Romans 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

Note that the resisting of a legal government authority, of a federal officer doing his lawful duty, is cause for the person to be damned. In other words, those who are resisting ICE, when they get hurt, have their “human rights violated” with pepper spray or busted heads, or even if their death is provoked, they are receiving the just rewards of resisting government authority. There is no other way to look at this. Every obedient citizen who respects this basic principle of government has empathy and support for those few men and women who risk life and limb in fulfilling their duty as an agent of the government.

So insurrection and revolutionary individuals are criminals, not heroes. These people should be condemned and judged for their crimes. When you study the history of Communism, you send some elements that seem to always pop up. The little value these governments put on the quality of life of their people as well as their very lives is obvious. You see the millions slaughtered under Communist and Socialist regimes, you have to have pity on those that suffered.

But you also have to notice the stupidity and gullibility of those same people. In the beginning, Socialism and Communism promises great blessings from the government. They use the Robinhood slogan, “we take from the rich to give to the poor.” But are the poor living in a paradise under present Communist governments? Check Cuba, Venezuela, China, Russia, North Korea. They are suffering more than they ever did suffer in the past history of these countries. But in all of them, Communism was a movement of insurrection against established government.

Once Communism takes over and is entrenched, they brutally oppose any kind of change from their government. No change is possible. Those in charge take turns (thus the famous Communist party of privileged people that have billionaires among them in China), and the rule is always that there is no more insurrection. The people are essentially slaves. People in these countries are imprisoned trying to escape that country. People from other countries do not sneak in illegally to those countries to live. Oppressed people try to get into the capitalist countries any way they can, legally and illegally.

I remember reading how people from Cuba were swimming in rafts and anything that could float from Cuba to Florida, and Biden ordered the US Coast Guard to pick them up in the water and return them to Havana not matter what they said their reason was. So the US wants more migrants, but under Biden, he wanted ones that vote Democrat. People from Cuba in the US tend to be Republicans. That is because they saw Communism first hand, and they fled that system for Capitalism. That is a point that so many Americans seem to skip over as important. Why do these immigrants want to enter the US at any cost? It is because life is always better under Capitalism that Communism.

Popular opinion has no place

We also need to understand that public opinion is a daffy thing. People turn one way or another at a moment’s notice, without much reason or logic behind what they are supporting today. There are principles that run the world. Those principles need to be understood and taught, guarded as one’s treasury.

The Problem with Communists

More Articles on Communists and Communism

• Welcome What is Conservative News About?
• George Soros Puppeteer
• Trump as a One-Term President Would Become DC’s Nightmare updated!
• Complaints Trump will continue in Politics
• President Trump’s Victories continued #3
• Robert Byrd’s relationship with the KKK
• Is White Supremacy Valid, Right?
• Constitution Overview
• Adam Schiff
• President Donald Trump