Global Warming Index Page

Global Warming Index Page is a page listing other articles and discussions about Global Warming and issues around it.

The Essence of the Global Warming Issue

Global warming is simple enough to explain. According to those who promote this issue as a do or die thing, humans use carbon or petroleum based products for energy and that causes excess CO2 in the air, and that rises heating the planet. Their conclusion is that we should prohibit or greatly restrict the use of these coal and petroleum products for energy.

The Counter point

The problem with this whole issue is that these people are making assumptions that are not backed up by real science. They invent things for politic purposes that they can manipulate for their own benefit.

1. The elevation of a non-real issue to be the most important topic of discussion (and money spent by the government) belies other important issues that are ignored, such as abortion, inflation, supply chain problems, etc. This is a non-issue that removes the focus and energy of our politicians about other real issues.
2. Humans and animals produce CO2. Remove all humans and animals and the plants die. There is no solution for CO2 because it is not a problem. Plants need a warm environment to grow best. When they grow best, they use up the CO2 to make oxygen. So it is a self healing system. Too much CO2, plant life goes wild and after 50 years (or some large time span), things balance out again. The oceans also absorb excess CO2. They use it to sustain their ecosystems. There is no problem here if it was not invented.
3. In reality, the impact that humans have on the planet as far as CO2 is concerned is negligible. There are no studies done to prove that human use of Carbon based fuels has a significant impact on global CO2 levels. A single volcanic eruption can throw out more CO2 that years of what humans produce. Volcanic eruptions happen all the time and are totally out of our control. How is it that before humans began the industrial age, the CO2 levels were higher than they are now?
4. There is a priority of human existence over planetary desires. Some people would like to return to what they imagine was early earth, before humans were around. This is the dinosaur age really. But why? God placed humans on the earth to live here and to use the earth as their home. When a person rejects God, then they reject this point. Human life becomes insignificant and they consider humans as a pest like cockroaches on their precious earth. This is unbiblical, and unreasonable that we (humans) allow these kinds of people with these viewpoints to make public policy and laws for us.

Global warming is simple enough to explain. According to those who promote this issue as a do or die thing, humans use carbon or petroleum based products for energy and that causes excess CO2 in the air, and that rises heating the planet. Their conclusion is that we should prohibit or greatly restrict the use of these coal and petroleum products for energy.

Some articles on Global Warming (this website)

• Climate Change causing Tornadoes
• Today’s News January 3, 2022
• Why big companies are woke
• Google against the Truth
• Lieberman-Warner Global Warming Legislation
• Is Global Warming Happening?

Some articles on Global Warming (other websites)

• AmericanThinker – Global Warming Theory
  How can it be that the planet has been warming on average since the last ice age some 20,000 years ago and that is nearly a post script in the discussion.  The experts speak of ocean level changes of 1/2 inch being critical over the next 100 years when in fact the sea level has changed by hundreds of feet in 20,000 years of on average constant warming with intermittent cooling.  Nearly all of that warming taking place while human kind as a species held on by a shoestring to existence on the planet.  Only in the last 200 years has significant progress been made in the real quality of life and then most of that taking place in the last 50 years.  Human kind had nothing to do with 99% of the time frame in that geologic snap shot and that is all but ignored.
  There is NO definitive study that correlates atmospheric carbon dioxide to climate change over millennia much less anthropogenic CO2.  The fact that atmospheric CO2 has increased in the last 100 years and simultaneously the planet has warmed does not correlate the two issues.  My hair has grayed in that time period so I suppose I could conclude that anthropogenic CO2 increases caused that as well and thereby begin litigation against  GM for my gray hair.  Ohhh wait someone in California has as much as done such a stupid thing already to bring litigation against all of the US auto makers.
• AmericanThinker.com –Fake News: Global Warming Edition
  U.N. scientists in 2013 noted a “pause” in global warming since 1998, confounding Al Gore, Prince Charles, Barack Obama, Leo DiCaprio, and others riding the global warming bandwagon. This pause was problematic in that it threw the entire man-made global warming proposition back to the drawing board. Why was there such a pause? Industrial activity hadn’t slowed. CO2 emissions were as robust as ever. The U.S. still hadn’t joined the Kyoto treaty. Why would there be a pause?
  When real scientists encounter contradictory data, they look at their original assumptions and hypothesis.  That’s the scientific method.  Instead, the climate scientists changed how the data was collected, using a new method that would confirm their preconceived notions.  Rather than collecting sea surface temperatures from buoys, they used ship-based temperature readings, which tend to be warmer, as the ship naturally warms the water around it.  As the whistleblower put it, “they had good data from buoys.  And they threw it out and ‘corrected’ it by using the bad data from ships.”
  When real scientists encounter contradictory data, they look at their original assumptions and hypothesis.  That’s the scientific method.  Instead, the climate scientists changed how the data was collected, using a new method that would confirm their preconceived notions.  Rather than collecting sea surface temperatures from buoys, they used ship-based temperature readings, which tend to be warmer, as the ship naturally warms the water around it.  As the whistleblower put it, “they had good data from buoys.  And they threw it out and ‘corrected’ it by using the bad data from ships.”
• The Many Myths of Global Warming

Global Warming Index Page