Antrim Dominion machine forensic analysis

Antrim Dominion machine forensic analysis

Antrim Dominion machine forensic analysis and the problems in this election, the evidence of fraud used by Democrats and ignored by Republicans.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/interesting_nuggets_from_the_antrim_dominion_machine_forensic_analysis.html

The topline summary is that the Dominion machines in Antrim County were set up to send almost 70% of votes to “adjudication.”*

*Adjudication is where a human (two actually, one from each party in the election) sit down and look at the ballot and decide which person the voter meant. If they cannot come to an agreement, then it goes to a federal judge I believe. According to the Federal Election Commission laws for elections, those who put on elections cannot use any machine for the voters to vote if it produces more than .0008% of the ballots for adjudication. So this stinks royally!

It was this “adjudication” process that dictated which candidate would receive the vote.  And just to make the process more opaque, Antrim County did something in 2020 it had never done since it started using the machines: it deleted all the adjudication entries.  The server logs are also missing.

With that heads up, here are summaries of the main points: the audit found that two different Dominion software programs were in use.  Programs should be standardized throughout an election “if election tabulation is the expected outcome as required by US Election Law.”  This type of difference “is a design feature to alter election outcomes.”  Under the Help America Vote Act, the Safe Harbor factor mandates that changes to election systems must cease 90 days before an election.  Michigan made these illegal changes and used the invalid second vote counts for certification purposes.

Most states using these machines updated the software the night before the election!

On November 6, after an illegal post-election software update, there was a vote recount in tiny Central Lake Township (fewer than 1,500 voters) that saw the same 1,400-plus ballots being run through the system twice, with a greater than 60% change in outcomes.  Federal election law allows a ballot error rate standard of 0.0008%.  These changes “demonstrate[] conclusively that votes can be and were changed during the second machine counting.  That should be impossible.”

Adjudication

Dominion Voting Machines

    Ballot Problems

    Dominion Voting Machines

    According to Dominion’s website, its machines also are used in the states of California, Utah, Alaska, Colorado, New Mexico, Illinois, New York, and New Jersey, plus Puerto Rico.--DailySignal

    The company donated between $25,000 and $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation in 2014, according to a Washington Post donor database. --DailySignal

    An audit of Dominion voting machines used in Michigan concluded that the systems are designed to perpetuate election fraud, supporting President Donald Trump’s claims of irregularities. State officials have criticized the report. --rt.com

    Earlier this month Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) in Dallas inspected the election equipment. Originally the report wasn't going to be made public without receiving approval from the judge first. Elsenheimer came back and said a report can be released as long as the software's coding are redacted. In the newly-released report, ASOG stated Dominion's software has a 68 percent chance of errors.

    "The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity," the report states. "The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error."

    "It is critical to understand that the Dominion system classifies ballots into two categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots. Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved between different Results Tally and Reporting (RTR) terminals with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch," the report states. "This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity because it provides no meaningful observation of the adjudication process or audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicated the ballots."  --Townhall.com

    Forensic Audit of Dominion Machines

    1. Dominion machines are intentionally designed to create fraud
    2. They are designed to manipulate data with no oversight
    3. Eliminating transparency is part of their signature
    4. They were intentionally designed to eliminate an audit trail
    5. The observable error rate is 68.05% when the Federal Election Comm. standard is 0.0008%
    6. Republican Clerk did not update software, exacerbating the situation
    7. Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan

    Audit bottom line: Michigan’s election should not be certified. - AmericanThinker.com

    Eddy Perez´defense of Smartmatic Voting Machines as not involved in fruad

    Perez has no first-hand knowledge. He recites information he’s heard from other sources.

    His tweets – both his own tweets and his retweets – indicate that Perez is not nonpartisan; instead, he actively supports Biden’s alleged win. --AmericanThinker.com

     

     

    Author: Pastor Dave

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *