Are Democrats in favor of Drug Addiction? is an examination of what Democrats are (their policies defining them) and what they say.
Table of Contents
The Government’s War on Drugs
Supposedly, our federal government is in a war on drugs. In other words, they accept that drugs destroy people’s health. Beyond their physical well-being, drugs destroy the social structures that make our society. Husbands and wives, parents and children, school friends and teachers, social relationships. If a politician accepts that drugs are bad, then they must take an active stance AGAINST DRUGS. That means: 1) they do no use drugs themselves nor allow, encourage, pay for, or overlook drug use by those people that are dependent on them. This point includes a mayor of a city, that he, as a politician responsible for his people would take every opportunity possible to oppose illicit drug use.
An Open Southern Border
See Democrats Nap Peacefully Through Border Crisis They Engineered
So in this article, it clearly lays out the fentanyl problem, and how the drug cartels are using this open southern border to get illicit drugs into the U.S. So how is Biden attacking this problem? He simply is not doing anything. You may as well not have border patrol for all that he is doing through them.
See President Biden Says Drug Users Shouldn’t Go To Jail
“No one should go to jail for a drug offense, no one should go to jail for the use of a drug,” President Joe Biden said.
So Biden’s official position is that drug users are not doing anything wrong. Can you agree with that? If you look into the typical drug user’s life, you will find that most cannot keep a good paying job and use drugs. In other words, on a personal level, drugs means no gainful work for the individual. Of course, their are individuals like Hunter Biden that uses illicit means to make money, and this is the common factor in drug use. Drug users steal, cheat, bribe, and in any other illicit way make their money to support their drug habit. That means at some level the normal people (normal as in not a drug user) have to work hard with sweat to get what they have, and these kind of people are the ones who steal from the hard workers. Is that fair? Should the government facilitate these drug users and their lifestyle or stop them dead in their tracks?
I found this interesting chart on the https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/ website. This is a George Soros founded group. The chart shows how Ecuador and Bolivia both have higher maximum prison sentence for drug trafficking than murder. Biden wants no prison time for drug users? Doesn’t that seem a little out of kilter for the crime? In other words, Biden doesn’t see drug use as a crime. Where did all of these drug offenders get their money for their drug use? Only through legitimate sources?
Biden overlooks Hunter’s Drug Use
It is very important to see that Joe Biden overlooks Hunter’s drug use (also his pornography use, his alcohol use, his lying to the FBI about not having a drug problem, and his use of prostitutes). When the Democrats tried to implicate Donald Trump morally, none of these kinds of things would be allowed. All of them would be a deal terminator if Trump protected and promoted one of his children in these activities. But somehow the world is blind to the Biden family’s problems. That is a separate non-issue in governing the country supposedly.
More Articles on Drugs and Alcohol
- Are Democrats in favor of Drug Addiction?
- Democrats and their Nanny State Mindset
- Income Redistribution is Stealing
- Boys Scouts sans Morality
- Robin Hood had it all Wrong
- What defined the Virtuous Woman of Proverbs?
- President Trump’s Achievements
Are Democrats in favor of Drug Addiction?
Problems with Total Depravity or Inability examines the flaws and errors of the Calvinist teaching of Total Depravity (which is really total inability, man is not responsible for his own actions and sins, because he cannot choose sin or obeying God). This is a short article about this point of Calvinism.
The argument of the Calvinists breaks down completely when we examine the Bible and find examples of various individuals that did please God with their lives. Calvinists says that there is nothing at all that any person can do to please God. Yet God views our lives, and in the Bible, certain people did please God like Noah. Maybe the difference was Noah’s life was "better" than everybody's else's wicked lives, but even from that standpoint, God still acted greatly because of Noah's faith and daily relationship with God. When God saves you and your family and kills everybody else on planet earth, that means something.
The bottom line: Calvinism does not take into consideration the places where God looked with approval on various people's lives. Their "system" is fatally flawed, therefore. Good works never save anybody, we can affirm this as true. But the "bottom line" here is that God does approve and disapprove different people's lives. Salvation is only by faith in Jesus Christ the Savior. But what you are depends on what you do. God judges every person, even the elect, and He rewards them as such. Things that God dislikes, God chastises those in hell, for the saved, God causes the elect to lose some of their heavenly rewards for their sins, if not also causing them problems in earth before they die.
Problems with Total Depravity or Inability.
