Attorney on MI Dominion voting machines: 68% error rate in counting ballots, which is supposed to be below .0008% by Election Laws. This post is being republished from December 18, 2020. Here we go again!
Attorney Matthew DePerno says that the Dominion voting machines have a 68% chance of creating an error with ballots, and those errors can then be adjudicated in bulk as ballots to a candidate of choice.
My (David Cox, webmaster) question is why are we using machines in the first place when counting by hand means getting the results late at night election day, or using a machine, it is inaccurate, and it takes days to confirm the results? Isn’t this 100% perception of an election fraud? In foreign countries, they have an election and the results are counted by hand and given sometimes an hour or two after the election closes. There is something extremely wrong here. Modernization is not slower, more inaccurate, etc. If it is, then you need to get rid of all this modern (usually young kids in their 20s now) people who want to use computers to do everything, and go back to proven methods that have shown themselves to be true and accurate.
Dominion Voting Machines
According to Dominion’s website, its machines also are used in the states of California, Utah, Alaska, Colorado, New Mexico, Illinois, New York, and New Jersey, plus Puerto Rico.–DailySignal
The company donated between $25,000 and $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation in 2014, according to a Washington Post donor database. —DailySignal
An audit of Dominion voting machines used in Michigan concluded that the systems are designed to perpetuate election fraud, supporting President Donald Trump’s claims of irregularities. State officials have criticized the report. —rt.com
Earlier this month Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) in Dallas inspected the election equipment. Originally the report wasn’t going to be made public without receiving approval from the judge first. Elsenheimer came back and said a report can be released as long as the software’s coding are redacted. In the newly-released report, ASOG stated Dominion’s software has a 68 percent chance of errors.
“The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity,” the report states. “The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error.”
“It is critical to understand that the Dominion system classifies ballots into two categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots. Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved between different Results Tally and Reporting (RTR) terminals with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch,” the report states. “This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity because it provides no meaningful observation of the adjudication process or audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicated the ballots.” —Townhall.com
Forensic Audit of Dominion Machines
- Dominion machines are intentionally designed to create fraud
- They are designed to manipulate data with no oversight
- Eliminating transparency is part of their signature
- They were intentionally designed to eliminate an audit trail
- The observable error rate is 68.05% when the Federal Election Comm. standard is 0.0008%
- Republican Clerk did not update software, exacerbating the situation
- Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan
Audit bottom line: Michigan’s election should not be certified. – AmericanThinker.com
Eddy Perez´defense of Smartmatic Voting Machines as not involved in fruad
Perez has no first-hand knowledge. He recites information he’s heard from other sources.
His tweets – both his own tweets and his retweets – indicate that Perez is not nonpartisan; instead, he actively supports Biden’s alleged win. —AmericanThinker.com
Election Fraud
- Stuffing the Ballot Boxes
- Attorney on MI Dominion voting machines: 68% error rate in counting ballots
- Past Election Fraud
- When does an election result change because of fraud
- Fraud Evidences in the 2020 Election
- China owns DOMINION Voting Machines
- Analyzing for Illegal Ballots
- How to hack an Election Machine
- 2020 Election Integrity – A Snapshot Showing Where We Stand
- Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections | Full Documentary…
- Why Democrats always fight with Inflation
- Beware of those who call good bad, and bad good
- How much do we really want to give away?
- Forming a Biblical Attitude towards the Poor
- Failure Kings of Politics
- Trump Administration Accomplishments thenationalpulse
- Why Blacks are turning Republican
- Stuffing the Ballot Boxes
- Attorney on MI Dominion voting machines: 68% error rate in counting ballots
- Kamala Flip-Flops on EV Cars
pc85 Carl Jung and Psychology explains the origin of Psychology with spiritist Jung, which had contact with a spiritual guide. Psychology is from a spiritist, who got the "science" of psychology (which is in no way a science or scientific) from a spirit, Philemon. (This is a demon speaking to a human, which is a medium, and prohibited in the Old Testament.) I analyze what Jung says with Scripture.
Topics: The Foundation of Psychology | Psychology is not a True Science | Psychology versus Psychoanalysis | The True Origin of Psychology: Philemon | Darkness versus Light | Ying and Yang | What Fellowship does Light have with Darkness? | Spiritism is Prohibited | Conclusion
pc85 Carl Jung and Psychology.
